Reading view

Trump asking Congress for symbolic expunging of his two impeachments

President is first in US history to be impeached twice, over abuse of power and inciting an insurrection

Donald Trump is pressing Congress to erase one of the darkest chapters of his political career, urging Republicans to pass a resolution that would symbolically nullify the two impeachments he suffered during his first term in office.

The effort, first reported by the Wall Street Journal and confirmed by a White House official, would allow Trump to claim a symbolic victory on a key grievance from his first term. But experts say it would have little legal significance, since the constitution provides no procedure for undoing an impeachment.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

© Photograph: Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

© Photograph: Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

  •  

Republicans prioritize effort to ‘expunge’ Trump’s impeachments from the record

There are roughly seven months remaining in the current Congress, and the Republican majorities in the House and Senate still have an opportunity to try to govern and pass worthwhile legislation that the American public might like.

As is too often the case, GOP leaders’ focus apparently lies elsewhere. The Wall Street Journal reported:

President Trump and his allies have discussed pushing lawmakers to pass a resolution aimed at voiding his first-term impeachments, according to people familiar with the matter.

The resolution would allow Trump to claim a symbolic victory on a matter that has dogged him since his first term, part of a broader effort to burnish his presidential legacy. It would have little legal significance, however, because the Constitution provides no procedure for undoing an impeachment, according to experts.

This is not simply a matter of backroom chatter and whispers from Capitol Hill hallways. Trump explicitly told the Journal, in reference to the efforts to “expunge” the record, “It should be done because I did nothing wrong.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson similarly told the newspaper that he believes the effort “makes a lot of sense.” The Louisiana Republican, who called the president’s impeachments a “sham” and “a hyperpartisan attack job,” added, “It is a priority and something that Congress should make right.”

Before we dig in on what might actually happen with this effort, it’s important to understand how we arrived at this point.

On Feb. 5, 2020, Trump’s first impeachment trial concluded in the Senate. On Feb. 7, 2020, the president first broached the subject of trying to “expunge” the record, calling the effort to hold him accountable a “hoax.”

His message resonated with some of his allies. Indeed, then-Rep. Markwayne Mullin — years before the Oklahoma Republican moved up to the Senate, and more recently the White House Cabinet — introduced a resolution that would have declared Trump’s first impeachment “expunged.” Soon after, Mullin also took aim at Trump’s second impeachment, and that effort gained the support of, among others, Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, who made some amazingly misguided arguments in support of the idea.

The effort was largely ignored by the Democratic majority in the House, but as 2023 got underway, then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy said he was willing to take a look at the idea, adding, “I would understand why members would want to bring that forward.”

Several GOP members endorsed the move and unveiled legislation soon after. To the president’s chagrin, the last Congress nevertheless failed to take action on this.

History buffs may recall that a related effort happened nearly two centuries ago. Lawmakers censured President Andrew Jackson in 1834, only to have his allies “expunge” the censure from the record in 1837 after control of the Senate switched party hands.

The point at the time was for partisans to say that the congressional action happened, but for the sake of the historical record, it didn’t really count. Trump and his acolytes appear to have similar intentions now.

Indeed, as recently as two months ago, Republican Rep. Darrell Issa of California introduced a measure to undo both of the president’s impeachments, which coincided with assorted items Trump posted on his social media platform endorsing the broader effort. The same week, as part of an effort that appeared quite coordinated, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard used her office to also take aim at the legitimacy of Trump’s first impeachment.

Just so we’re all clear, this is entirely about Trump’s ego and hurt feelings. There is no mechanism in place that allows for a president to be unimpeached. But Trump sees this as a stain on his record, and he’s eager to have sycophantic GOP members do his bidding, rewrite the recent past, symbolically wipe the slate clean and make him feel better about himself.

Whether such a campaign could generate majority support, however, remains to be seen. Watch this space.

The post Republicans prioritize effort to ‘expunge’ Trump’s impeachments from the record appeared first on MS NOW.

  •  

After Trump became a problem for Cornyn, Cornyn may soon become a problem for Trump

Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana spent a year and a half trying to avoid Donald Trump’s wrath, in the hopes that it might help save his career. It didn’t work: The president, still enraged by Cassidy’s 2021 impeachment vote, helped orchestrate the senator’s primary defeat in mid-May.

Newly liberated, the Louisianan wasted little time showing renewed independence, defying the White House’s wishes on several issues.

Roughly a week after Cassidy’s loss, a similar dynamic unfolded in Texas, where incumbent Republican senator John Cornyn went to even greater lengths to stay on the president’s good side, only to see Trump back his primary rival and ensure his defeat.

An obvious question soon followed: After Trump became a problem for Cornyn, would Cornyn become a problem for Trump? An answer is starting to come into focus. The New York Times reported:

Now the Trump administration might find itself having to come to terms with Mr. Cornyn as he flexes new political freedom, joining a handful of other Senate Republicans not seeking re-election or defeated in primaries at Mr. Trump’s behest who now have added room to maneuver.

“I think it is going to be a pretty bumpy ride for the next seven months,” Mr. Cornyn said during a wide-ranging conversation in his Capitol office as he reflected on the tumultuous Texas election and his nearly quarter-century in Washington.

To be sure, there are key qualitative differences between Cornyn and Cassidy: The Texan is clearly to the Louisianan’s right. Even if Cornyn were to decide to ignore party pressures and the White House’s wishes altogether and simply vote his conscience on every matter, he’d still rarely buck the party line.

That said, it’s been interesting to see some unsubtle shifts in recent days. Before Trump endorsed his primary challenger, for example, the Texan launched an effort to rename a highway after the president. In the wake of Trump helping end Cornyn’s career, the senator decided the highway project was no longer a priority.

Similarly, when the president announced that Bill Pulte, the highly controversial director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, would serve as the acting director of national intelligence, Cornyn was among the first GOP senators to say publicly that Pulte was unqualified for the position.

But the Times’ report highlighted an issue of even greater significance.

After Trump withdrew his outlandish $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS last month, he received two scandalous rewards from his own administration. The first was the creation of a nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund, while the other was an IRS audit shield, unveiled by his Justice Department, granting Trump, his family and his controversial businesses immunity from all existing IRS tax audits.

Of the two rewards, the former appears to have been discarded in the face of overwhelming bipartisan opposition, while the latter remains intact.

Cornyn, however, is opposed to both.

“I think that’s a terrible mistake,” Cornyn told the Times, referring to the audit shield. “The president needs to be treated like everybody else.”

Whether the Texas Republican actually intends to do anything about this belief remains to be seen, but his newly stated position keeps the issue alive and at least opens the door to potential congressional action.

As for the big picture, Cornyn went on to tell the Times, in reference to Trump, “If he would do that to me, he would do that to anybody. There’s never going to be good enough for him, other than 100%, you know, slavish adherence to whatever he wants. But obviously that’s not what the senator’s role is supposed to be, especially in terms of checks and balances.”

Putting aside the question of why it took a full decade for Cornyn to recognize this problem, he has a unique opportunity to partner with the so-called YOLO caucus with six months remaining before his involuntary exit from Capitol Hill. Watch this space.

The post After Trump became a problem for Cornyn, Cornyn may soon become a problem for Trump appeared first on MS NOW.

  •  

Crowd gathers at Kennedy Center after court denies Trump’s emergency appeal to keep his name on building – as it happened

This live blog is now closed.

Donald Trump and his allies have discussed pushing lawmakers to pass a resolution aimed at voiding his first-term impeachments, the Wall Street Journal reported last night, citing people familiar with the matter.

It should be done because I did nothing wrong,” Trump said when asked about the resolution in a phone call this week with the Journal. “It was a rigged deal — it was a whole rigged situation.”

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

© Photograph: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

© Photograph: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

  •  

A powerful US surveillance law is set to expire – what happens now?

Congress has failed to reauthorize section 702 of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act amid questions over its future

Donald Trump’s bid to install a controversial ally as the country’s leading intelligence official has shone a light on the wide reach of a powerful surveillance law, and raised questions over its future.

Privacy advocates say it deserves scrutiny, and reform, regardless of who the US president appoints as director of national intelligence (DNI).

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Ken Cedeno/Reuters

© Photograph: Ken Cedeno/Reuters

© Photograph: Ken Cedeno/Reuters

  •  
❌